The Next Plandemic, Part 1
How Bill Gates and the New World Order fiends have signaled what's next ...
Dear Reader: I wrote this article about 2 years ago and I am only now (July 31, 2024) publishing it. But, it remains just as relevant today.
Before you call me a “conspiracy theorist” simply for using the term “Plandemic” in my title, know that I am just using the White House’s own words (Psaki's "Plandemic"). So, I’m in good company.
If there is one thing we have learned from the evil unfolding before us during this worldwide response to Covid, it is that there exists a spiritual law: the darkness must first proclaim, in public, what evil deeds they want to do before they actually do them. (I will tell you in a later post how to easily defeat this tactic of theirs. I’ve done it and it works). But, boy, did they tell us what evil they were gonna do!
Case in point: Bill Gates and his fiends friends were very clear about what they were planning. They told us. And we did not work hard enough to stop it. As it has been said, “All it takes for evil to thrive is for good men to do nothing.” Let’s review the signals they sent us in the lead-up to the Covid plandemic …
Dean Koontz writes a book called “The Eyes of Darkness” in 1981, depicting the outbreak of a lethal man-made virus from Wuhan, China
Sylvia Browne, self-proclaimed “psychic,” writes a book called “End of Days” in 2008, in which she predicts a “pneumonia-like global pandemic in 2020.”
2015: Moderna applies for (and is later approved for) a patent on a modified spike protein.1 Of note, one cannot patent a thing found in nature. If I find a squirrel, I can not pick it up and patent it. However, if I genetically modify that squirrel, then I can patent it. Moderna genetically modified the spike protein and patented it. And, I’m sorry to say, their modification didn’t make it more “friendly.” In fact, their modification included a reverse-complement to a cancer-regulation gene called MSH3. (When the balance between MSH3 and other cancer-regulating proteins is thrown off, it causes new cancers to sprout up2 3)
2015: Peter Daszak, head of the EcoHealth Alliance (and funder of coronavirus research in Wuhan) 4 5 says: “We need to increase the public understanding of the need for medical countermeasures, such as a pan-coronavirus vaccine. A key driver is the media and the economics will follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues. Investors will respond when they see profit at the end of the process.”6 Now, before we parse his statement, let’s review who Peter Daszak is: Apparently, Daszak had been courting Tony Fauci (head of NIAID) for years, trying to wine and dine him in order to get some funds sent his way. Eventually, it worked and good ole Pete went to work sending some of that money to a lab in Wuhan, China. The same lab that was studying coronaviruses. The same lab accused of performing gain-of-function studies on (ie, creating more virulent strains of) coronavirus. In fact, they passed coronavirus samples (which were not infectious against humans) over samples of human lung tissue to make them pathogenic against human lung.7 Apparently, it worked. This same Peter Daszak tried to cover his tracks in Wuhan by orchestrating 27 scientists in writing a political letter to The Lancet. That letter devolved into name-calling, stating that the lab leak theory was a “conspiracy theory” and yet provided no independent evidence to support their position (the evidence cited were articles by the very people under investigation). Their conclusion was, essentially: There was no possible way the pandemic could have come from the same Wuhan lab where Peter was sending his money. Well, there couldn’t be real evidence because there was no real, independent investigation. Why is that? Because … guess who was put in charge of investigating?
Now, Let’s review what Daszak said in proper context, with appropriate emphasis: “We need to increase the public understanding of the need for medical countermeasures, such as a pan-coronavirus vaccine [who was talking about coronavirus vaccines in 2015?]. A key driver is the media and the economics will follow the hype. [economics will follow the science? NO! economics will follow the data? NO. Economics will follow the evidence? NO. Economics will follow the best public-health course of action? NO. “Economics will follow the hype” and the media will drive that hype] We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues. Investors will respond when they see profit at the end of the process.”
In other words: “we need to create hysteria using the media. Then, we’ll use the hysteria to push a coronavirus vaccine. Then we’ll roll up to the bank to cash in our huge vaccine checks.” The “real issue,” according to Daszak, is not that public health will be made stronger. The “real issue” is how investors respond.
January 2017:
Fauci warns that "no doubt [the incoming Trump administration] will be faced with the [infectious disease] challenges their predecessors were faced with" and "we will definitely get surprised in the next few years."8 [Quick question: I’m not a smart guy, so I get easily confused: how do you get “surprised” by something if you’re predicting that something?]
October 18, 2019.
The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, in conjunction with the World Economic Forum (WEF), Johns Hopkins University, a bunch of government actors, Big Pharma reps, and many of the corporate media players (NBC News, ABC News, CBS News, etc) played out a pandemic “war games” exercise, called Event 201. Did they focus on addressing public health concerns, like how to intervene early in a pandemic? Not so much. How about focusing on re-purposing FDA-approved drugs? Not so much. How about the best ways to create an open exchange of ideas in the scientific community with mutual respect for divergent opinions in order to find novel solutions? Not so much. In fact, the CIA were involved in this exercise. A spy organization…involved in public health. Hmmm. And mock videos (here and here) showed actors playing newscasters talking about how to control the spread of “misinformation.” Not how to sponsor the open exchange of ideas. But how to squash “misinformation” (ie, free speech). The topper? …. Everyone who participated left with a nice party gift: a stuffed coronavirus, complete with red spike proteins and all. Probably just a coincidence.
November 7, 2019:
Netflix releases “Explained: The Next Pandemic” in which Bill Gates predicts a Chinese wet market potentially spawning a disease, a deadly pandemic, in fact, for which the world was unprepared. Chinese wet market? That’s pretty specific, Bill. But … Probably just a coincidence.9
November 2019, later in the month:
The first case ever, of Covid-19, is seen in Wuhan, China. The source is claimed to be the Wuhan wet market, which is located just 400 yards from the Wuhan Institute of Virology (the same institute funded by Peter Daszak). Probably just a coincidence.
Pandemic ensues, leading to draconian, unprecedented, worldwide lockdowns.
2020:
The SARS-CoV-2 virus is reputed to be the cause of the pandemic. Later, it is found that Moderna’s patented spike protein shows up in the virus itself. Not in the vaccine. In the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Yes, the virus that escaped from a lab in Wuhan. Yes, the virus that caused the “pandemic.” And yes, the same spike protein that contains a sequence that may lead to cancer. In fact, the sequence of the spike protein in the circulating SARS-CoV-2 virus is a 100% match to Moderna’s proprietary, patented sequence (Moderna’s SP in SARS-CoV-2). “It could have arisen de novo, through mutations and natural evolution.” Yeah, that’s probably it. There’s a massive chance of that. Overwhelming odds, as I recall. What were those odds, again? Oh, that’s right: there was only a 1 in 3 trillion chance of that happening! But, if you listen to the legacy media, that’s probably the most “rational” explanation. This is all …. Probably just a coincidence.
So, there you have it: the backdrop for the Covid “pandemic.” The signaling by the government, the military, corporate media, corporate news, Bill Gates, the scientific community, and even the cultural arts (science fiction writers) … all screaming “Coronavirus pandemic … incoming!”
So, what are Bill Gates and the scientific community up to next?
Here’s a preview. It is so devious and so deadly that it makes Bill Gates and his (now ex-) wife giddy when they think about it:
Watch from minute 6:43 to 6:57 ... "we'll have to prepare for the next one [ie, pandemic] ... that [CHESHIRE GRIN!] will get attention this time ..."
Click the “Subscribe now” button to find out what “Plandemic” they are planning next.
[Hint: it may be the reason Johnson&Johnson stopped making the Covid vaccines … so that they could switch to the next, more profitable one10]
And yes, the same Peter Daszak who tried to cover his tracks in Wuhan by orchestrating 27 scientists in writing a political letter to The Lancet. That letter stated, without any real evidence, that there is no possible way the pandemic could have come from the same Wuhan lab where Peter was sending his money. There couldn’t be real evidence because there was no real investigation.
And yes, the same Peter Daszak who was put in charge of investigating the Wuhan lab and refused to investigate it. The same Peter Daszak who said the virus couldn’t have come from the lab (to which he was sending money), despite not actually looking into it. That Peter Daszak.
Yes, the same Peter Daszak who sent money to the lab in Wuhan China to study coronaviruses, but—according to the so-called “fact checkers” and corporate media—it wasn’t to fund the creation of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
And yes, the same Peter Daszak who tried to cover his tracks in Wuhan by orchestrating 27 scientists in writing a political letter to The Lancet. That letter stated, without any real evidence, that there is no possible way the pandemic could have come from the same Wuhan lab where Peter was sending his money. There couldn’t be real evidence because there was no real investigation.
So 2020 Covid was absolutely just practicing for the real deal in 2024. We all need to be prepared to likely die, because of the rich philanthropists who care so much about humanity that they want to put us out of our joy of living. So that there is sure to be enough resources left for them to feel good about living a life of excess and claiming dominion over the ones that are left? I think we just need to go back to the witch-hunting days, with pitch forks and torches, show up wherever they happen to be and have a public trial and sentencing right then and there!
Welcome to Substack